November 16, 2009 Comments

Start-up culture and all that Jazz

By David Alston in social media

I had an opportunity to explain start-up culture to a friend tonight.  And being one to never shy away from an analogy…

Joining a start-up is like joining a jazz trio for daily jam sessions.

Image credit - Fixed Image via Flickr

(Image Credit – Fixed Image via Flickr)

So what’s a jazz jam session like?  I think of a bunch of deeply talented folks, each with their area of expertise, brought together in a room, playing off the energy of the community there and riffing off of each other.  They know their instruments well and often come to the table with years of jazz experience.  They improv and go with the flow.  The pace is snappy but confident.  There is potentially no rehearsal time.  Perfection is not the name of the game but instead, creating something cool together.  It’s about enjoying the time together and enjoying the imperfections that surface as signs of character.  I explain start-up culture like this because it’s often hard to convey to someone who’s not familiar with it.

If you come from a large enterprise culture then you might be more familiar with another musical style, more like a symphony orchestra.  Symphony orchestras are larger with many experts as well.  These experts practice and plan a lot because the idea of the symphony is playing in perfect sync, no mistakes, no improvising.  The beauty of a perfectly orchestrated symphony is simply music to our ears.  Symphony orchestras produce some amazing music, like jazz trios, but the processes to produce the music and the results are very, very different.

Let’s say you are joining a jazz trio (aka start-up) as a drummer or sax player.  The other jazz players generally don’t practice ahead for their nightly sessions.  They “be” the music and would look for the drummer to immediately pick up on this and just go with the flow.  Over the following week the new drummer would focus on fitting into the groove, the pace and the style of the existing players.  He or she may also start introducing new flavors of drumming to add their own feel and help the group grow in a new way.  Learning happens through doing and the doing starts day one because the group needs a drummer. If you were used to playing the drums in a symphony orchestra then this approach could completely throw you at first.

So imagine joining a symphony orchestra as the drum player instead.  You would practice lots in advance to get up to speed, perhaps getting recordings of the orchestra to play (plan out) on your own first.  You would also have lots of sheet music to go on for practicing.  Before you performed in front of the audience (community) you would invest a lot in planning/practice time, until you felt you met the requirements.

Both have require processes.  Both attract different types of musicians.  Some folks successfully cross over.  Some folks discover to their pleasure that they’ve been trapped in one style and when they try the other process/style they feel like they’ve truly come home.

So what type are you more aligned with?  Does the analogy work for you?

Tags: , , ,

  • Wow Eric I was just thinking about that same thing the day after I wrote this. Indeed, the entrepreneur type is the other end of the spectrum and more like a solo artist. Great idea and on the books for the next post perhaps.

    Cheers and thanks. D
  • I like your analogy. As long as there's no smooth jazz involved.

    I think you could even extend this analogy to include solo start-up developers -- they're like the sax player on the street corner with a hat out for tips.

    I think this is your gem and perhaps a jumping off point for a related blog post: "It’s about enjoying the time together and enjoying the imperfections that surface as signs of character."
  • @keith - Ahh, I knew you were a jazz player :) I tried to teach myself the sax a dozen years ago but alas never had the trio to play with and to give me motivation. I guess I'm not a solo artist :)

    @tom - very cool riffing on this idea. I like the extra flavor you brought to it. I hadn't thought of the conductor role in this analogy so thanks for giving that some life.
  • tom
    Good points.

    I think the main difference between a symphony and a jazz trio is leadership. In a jazz trio everyone is a leader at some point. When it's their time for a solo they lead and their riff can send the other two players down a different path.

    With a symphony there is a true leader in the conductor. They pull people together to make something happen in alignment with what they understand as the vision of the piece.

    Small symphonies have experimented, quite successfully, with the no leader model. Each of the instrumentation groups (strings, woodwinds, brass...) have designated leaders who then work with the other leaders to determine the direction.

    Going from jazz trio to big band symphony is a natural progression for some companies but others see great success in staying a jazz trio/quartet. It truly is a matter of how well each person on the group feels about becoming a leader.

    thanks for the thoughts.
  • David, when you put it like that I guess there is no question that I am a Jazz performer. Heck, I played in the jazz band in high school because I could not read music. The teacher there allowed me to join in because we were highly talented and fed of each other. While I always saw the benefit in knowing all the notes and the standard ways of playing I could never fit myself into that box. Still to this day...if you put me in a box I will break it out for sure. Great post!
    Keith
blog comments powered by Disqus